Reed Crandall at DC in 1953!
The stand-out Crandallism on page 2 is the posture of the lady in the last panel.
On page 3. the lady's face in panel 2 is a maybe-Crandall tip-off but the same lady's face in panel 4 is 100% Crandall staging.
The unsympathetic inker totally obscured Crandall on page 4. Thanks, buddy.
There's not too much to latch onto on page 5 either, although both heads in panel 2 exude strong scents of Crandall.
Panel 5 on page 6 is the most obviously Crandall but all of the panels on this page have the feel of Crandall, sadly obscured by ham-handed inking.
Panel 3 on page 7 is the dead give-away that first got me thinking about Reed Crandall regarding the artwork in this story. If there were more hours in the day I would scour through other Crandall comics and find multiple instances of the frazzled-character posing used in this panel. The end.
Have I convinced you? Do you accept my evidence? If you are a Reed Crandall aficionado (as all comics fans truly should be) then please post a comment to this article as to whether you say Yay or Nay to my thesis. If I hear some agreement (or at least no disagreement) then I will write to GCD and encourage them to update their database with this new information.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home